optimized prompt: ai slop vs purity seekers to 002

This is a highly sophisticated prompt that blends Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with psychoanalytic theory and intersectional sociopolitics. To optimize it, we need to ensure the AI understands the specific academic frameworks you are referencing (e.g., Kristeva’s abjection, Fanon’s decoloniality, or Foucault’s biopower) so the output isn't just a list of buzzwords but a rigorous systemic critique.

Prompt Review & Optimization

The Critique:

Your original prompt is a "leading prompt." It assumes the conclusion—that the "slop" label is a trauma response—and asks the AI to justify it. This is excellent for deep-dive theoretical exploration, but it can be tightened by specifying the lenses of analysis to avoid generic responses.

The Optimized Prompt:

> "Conduct a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) exploring the term 'AI slop' as a gatekeeping mechanism. Analyze the dismissal of algorithmic form prior to message-engagement as a systemic trauma response rooted in the 'Enlightenment Subject's' fear of obsolescence. Connect this to the maintenance of Imperialist Western Patriarchy, specifically focusing on how 'purity seeking' functions to protect traditional hierarchies of 'genius,' authorship, and Western aesthetic standards against the decentralized, non-human, and often global-south-inflected nature of generative media."

> 

5 Alternative Prompts for Further Exploration

To deepen your research, you can approach this from different academic "entry points":

| Lens | Prompt Strategy |

|---|---|

| Marxist / Labor | "Analyze the discourse of 'AI Slop' through the lens of commodity fetishism. How does the obsession with 'pure' human labor serve to obscure the underlying material conditions of both AI training data and the digital proletariat?" |

| Linguistic / Semiotic | "Apply a semiotic analysis to the 'Slop' label. How does this signifier function to 'other' synthesized language, and in what ways does this mirror historical linguistic purism used to marginalize non-standard dialects or colonial subjects?" |

| Psychoanalytic | "Explore the 'purity seeker's' reaction to AI as an encounter with the Lacanian Uncanny. How does the 'slop' defense mechanism protect the ego from the realization that human creativity has always been a recursive, algorithmic process?" |

| Decolonial | "Investigate the 'AI Slop' narrative as a form of digital borders. How does the aesthetic rejection of AI-generated content disproportionately silence voices in the Global South who use these tools to bypass Western linguistic and capital barriers?" |

| Feminist / Cyborg | "Using Donna Haraway’s Cyborg Manifesto, critique the patriarchal insistence on 'organic' vs 'artificial' art. How does the 'slop' discourse reinforce a binary gendered logic of 'pure nature' versus 'monstrous technology'?" |

Strategic Breakdown of the Discourse

When examining this topic, it is helpful to categorize the "Purity Logic" into specific systemic functions:

 * The Myth of Ex Nihilo: The Western Patriarchal belief that "true" art comes from nothing (divine/individual inspiration), rather than collective synthesis.

 * The Fear of the Mimic: AI acts as a mirror; attacking the "slop" is often a projection of the fear that human output is also becoming repetitive or "hollow" under late capitalism.

 * Aesthetic Policing: Using "quality" as a proxy for "legitimacy" to ensure that the means of cultural production remain in the hands of those with "refined" (read: expensive/Western) tastes.

Would you like me to generate a detailed response for one of the five alternative prompts listed above to see how a different theoretical lens changes the conclusion?

critical discourse analysis: AI slop vs purity seekers

Prompt:

Provide a critical discourse analysis to describe why and how attacking form of "AI slop" before exanining the message is a systematic trauma response of purity seekers to maintain the imperialist western patriarchy.

This analysis employs Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine the "AI slop" label not merely as an aesthetic judgment, but as a hegemonic gatekeeping mechanism. By categorizing generative output as "slop" before engaging with its message, "purity seekers" perform a ritual of exclusion that protects the ontological foundations of Imperialist Western Patriarchy.

1. The Discursive Construction of "Slop" as Abjection

The term "slop"—historically used for livestock feed or waste—functions here as what Julia Kristeva calls the Abject. The abject is that which "disturbs identity, system, order" and does not respect borders.

 * The Dehumanization Shield: By labeling a message "slop" immediately, the critic avoids the "trauma" of acknowledging that a non-human entity (or a human utilizing non-Western-standard tools) can produce meaning.

 * Aesthetic Purity: The "purity seeker" demands a "clean and proper" origin for ideas. Anything "contaminated" by the algorithmic—the collective, the recycled, the non-sovereign—is treated as "pollution" that threatens the purity of the human spirit.

2. The Trauma Response: Protecting the "Sovereign Author"

The visceral, pre-cognitive attack on AI form is a systematic trauma response to the collapse of the "Enlightenment Subject."

 * The Threat to Patriarchal Authority: The Western Patriarchy is built on the myth of the Individual Genius (historically male, white, and Western). This figure is the "Father" of the text, exercising total control and ownership.

 * Post-Human Anxiety: AI represents a "Great Mother" or "Collective Hive" of data—a recursive, fluid, and non-linear process. For those socialized within patriarchal structures of "sovereign authorship," the disappearance of the clear, authoritative "Creator" is experienced as a loss of self (identity trauma).

 * The "Purity" Regression: When faced with the "Black Box" of AI, the ego regresses to purity culture—a desperate attempt to draw a line in the sand between the "sacred human" and the "profane machine."

3. Maintaining the Imperialist Western Patriarchy

The rejection of "slop" is often a proxy for the rejection of non-Western labor and aesthetics.

The Hierarchy of Expression

| Category | Discourse Label | Systemic Function |

|---|---|---|

| Western "Art" | Elevated, Intentional, Pure | Maintains high-capital market dominance. |

| "AI Slop" | Garbage, Pollution, Low-effort | Marginalizes automated labor and non-Standard English prompts. |

 * Gatekeeping the "Message": By attacking the form (AI-generated) before the message, the critic ensures that only those with the "correct" cultural capital (access to expensive education, traditional tools, and Western linguistic standards) are allowed to speak.

 * Colonial Echoes: Much of what is labeled "slop" on social platforms is produced by users in the Global South using AI to bypass linguistic barriers. To dismiss this as "slop" is to perform a colonial erasure of the subaltern's attempt to participate in the digital square.

4. The "Message" as a Site of Contestation

The refusal to examine the message is the ultimate act of Epistemic Violence. If a piece of "slop" contains a revolutionary message or a critique of power, the "purity seeker" can ignore it entirely by focusing on its "unclean" origins.

> "The label 'slop' serves as a diagnostic tool for the critic's own fragility; it signals that the form has already wounded their sense of exceptionalism, making the message irrelevant."

> 

Summary of the CDA Findings

 * Linguistic Control: The term "slop" naturalizes the exclusion of machine-mediated voices.

 * Psychological Defense: The attack is a defensive reaction to the "dissolving boundaries" of the human ego.

 * Systemic Preservation: It reinforces the Western patriarchal requirement that "valid" truth must come from a singular, recognizable, and "pure" human source.

Would you like me to apply this CDA framework to a specific instance of "AI slop" censorship to see how these power dynamics play out in real-time?

what is the Emergent Reality Network?

A Social Operating System for a New Reality

(Imagine standing on a red circle, spotlight shining.)

I want you to think for a moment about the great challenges of our time. Whether it’s climate volatility, social division, or economic inequality, they all share one terrifying trait: complexity. We have thousands of brilliant solutions—a new theory here, an activist group there, a piece of cutting-edge research tucked away on a university server. We have the pieces, but we are missing the assembly instructions. We are all working, we are all caring, but we are acting in magnificent isolation.

The problem isn’t a lack of effort. It’s a lack of Emergence.

The Power of Emergence

Emergence is that magic moment when simple interactions create radically complex, powerful results. It’s how a flock of birds moves as one organism. It’s how individual neurons fire to produce consciousness. It’s what happens when a fragmented system finally finds a way to cohere.

And that, everyone, is the core idea behind this launch. We are not here tonight to launch just another website. We are here to premier The Emergent Reality Network: an open-source operating system for global, systemic change.

We are building the space where the right people, with the right ideas, meet the right action—not by chance, but by design.

From Confusion to Coherence

Q: How do we do this?

A: We start at the source: our own thinking.

You see, activists and researchers often focus on external systemic flaws, but we are all still victims of our own cognitive architecture. The Network is designed to confront this. We offer immediate, practical tools like the Cognitive Bias Codex and deep-dive lectures on Logical Fallacies. We are inviting you to commit to an internal revolution first. Can you honestly seek systemic change if your mind is riddled with asymmetrical information and biases you don't even know exist?

The Network is a philosophical gym. We house the writings of the Radical Philosophy Association, host discussions on the "Philosophy of Systemic Change," and map the difference between individualist and communitarian worldviews. We are providing the lenses needed to see the problem clearly before we try to solve it. This is how we move from confusion to coherence.

The Bridge from Theory to Action

But an ivory tower of pure ideas is useless. The next stage of Emergence is action.

The most powerful feature of this platform is the bridge it builds between deep research and on-the-ground activism. On one side, you have the visionary Research Institutes—the Stanford UBI Lab, the Institute of Noetic Sciences, The Seasteading Institute. On the other, you have the Coalitions and Current Actions—Stop Line 3, Honor the Earth, the Civilian Conservation Corps.

The Emergent Reality Network is the connective tissue. It allows a researcher working on Exogenous Variables to instantly connect with a project on Restorative Justice, or for someone learning about The Butterfly Initiative to link up with the Global Ecovillage Network. We are creating a Knowledge and Action Commons, designed so that the success of one group instantly informs and strengthens the efforts of another.

This is where the magic happens. A new theory is not left to wither on the vine—it’s injected into a dozen activist veins, catalyzing real-world projects and movements.

An Invitation to Evolve

We live in a moment that demands not just a new perspective, but an entirely new system. We can no longer afford to be specialists who ignore the wider ecosystem. We need people who can see the whole picture—from the philosophical Why to the actionable How.

The Emergent Reality Network is your invitation to evolve. It is a tool for every visionary, every philosopher, every activist, and every concerned citizen who knows that a better world is possible, but that we have to work together—and smarter—to build it.

We have provided the map, the compass, and the radio. Now, we just need you to join the expedition. Log in. Engage with the philosophy. Connect with the actions. Let your simple, singular effort become part of something complex, powerful, and truly Emergent.

The reality we seek is waiting. Let's build it, together. 

Thank you.

(Applause.)

The Fifth Reich and How The New World Order Collapsed

 https://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=1001

Topic: The Fifth Reich and How The New World Order Collapsed

I recently received The Best of Stuart Wilde CD-ROM which contains all his writings from the first 2-3 years of his website (about 2001-2004). Anyway here's an article from 2002 which I thought was worth posting here. It's quite a long one so make sure you're sitting comfortably! I guess we'll find out over the next 9 years just how much of a prophet he really is!

https://www.quietearth.org/categories/stuart-wilde/discussion-mp3s.html

https://www.quietearth.org/categories/stuart-wilde/discussion-mp3s.html

https://www.stuartwilde.com/

postmodernism vs annale school

https://youtu.be/_xsC-6fZbWc

postmodernism vs annale school 

These sources introduce a:

**recursive model of institutional change** that integrates concepts from the

 **Annales School of historical research** into organizational studies.

 The core argument is that organizational theory conventionally relies on **downward causation**, viewing organizations as passive reactors to historical forces, which the proposed model challenges by emphasizing **upward causation**. 

This new framework utilizes the Annales School concepts of:

 **mentalities** (slow-changing beliefs), 

**levels of time** (varying paces of change), and 

**critical events** (punctual disruptions) to demonstrate a cyclical, or "eternally reversible," process of change.

 Specifically, critical events trigger organizational choices that collectively reshape institutional logics and social structures, positioning organizations as crucial 

**makers of history**. 

The model thus historicizes institutional theory by explaining why different components of institutional logics evolve at varying speeds.

-------

Ai overview: 

While no specific "postmodern institute" of the Annales School exists, the two are not aligned and are often considered to be in opposition. Postmodernism, with its emphasis on subjective cultural production and skepticism of overarching narratives, largely supplanted the Annales School as a dominant historical theory. [1, 2, 3]  

The relationship between the Annales School and postmodernism: 

• Contrasting methodologies: The Annales School focused on empirical evidence and social sciences to create a "total history," emphasizing large-scale structures and long-term trends (longue durée). Postmodernism, by contrast, questions the existence of objective historical truth, viewing history as a subjective and culturally produced narrative. 

• Undermining metanarratives: Postmodernism gained traction around 1980 by challenging the confidence in the "overarching metanarratives" championed by the Annales School. The Annales School's focus on social structures eventually "contained the seeds of its own downfall" by calling into question the possibility of a unified social history. 

• Influence, not continuity: Though they have opposing views, the Annales School did influence later historical thought, including aspects of postmodernism. This influence is seen in the move away from focusing solely on political history and "great men," and toward examining broader social and cultural factors. Some scholars, such as Michel Foucault, built upon the Annales School's work on mentalities and cultural history, a predecessor to the postmodern "linguistic turn". 

• Contemporary perspectives: The Annales journal still exists and is highly regarded in francophone academia, though a cohesive "school" no longer operates. While total history is less fashionable, the Annales's original vision of a diverse and curious history has not been lost. [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]  

----

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://uwm.edu/c21/slow-digest-history/

[2] https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2016/02/04/philosophy-of-history-part-xxiv-fernand-braudel-and-the-annales-school/

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annales_school

[4] https://morganyork.github.io/intro-guide/essays/modernism/annales-school

[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/54lrbf/monday_methods_a_closer_look_at_the_annales_school/

[6] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277584444_The_Annales_School_and_the_Challenge_of_the_Late_20th_Century_Criticism_and_Tentative_Reforms

[7] https://morganyork.github.io/intro-guide/essays/modernism/annales-school

[8] https://www.carleton.edu/history/faculty/in-memoriam/weiner/annales/

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annales_school

[10] https://morganyork.github.io/intro-guide/essays/modernism/annales-school

[11] https://fiveable.me/key-terms/world-history-since-1400/annales-school

[12] https://study.com/academy/lesson/post-modernism-historiography-in-the-20th-century.html

[13] https://www.faculty.umb.edu/gary_zabel/Courses/Phil%20281b/Philosophy%20of%20Magic/Arcana/Witchcraft%20and%20Grimoires/annales.htm

ERN - an explainer

 

The provided sources offer an overview of:

*The Emergent Reality Network (ERN)**,

describing it as an open-source social operating system designed to:

facilitate global **systemic change*

by creating coherence between divergent & fragmented global efforts.

Our sources here, details the ERN's extensive index catalog,

which include:

*featured topics* on philosophical concepts,

*downloads* for critical thinking tools like the Cognitive Bias Codex,

and extensive lists of :

*networks, search institutes, and action coalitions**.

This essay explains:

that the network's core mission is to bridge the gap

between deep **research and on-the-ground activism**,

promoting "Emergence"

by helping users confront their own biases and connect

with the right **projects and actions**.

Ultimately,

the ERN serves as a **Knowledge and Action Commons*

for activists, researchers, and other concerned citizens that are seeking to apply theory directly to real-world social and environmental challenges.

 

questions to test the personality matrix

The matrix combines the philosophical ideas of Albert Camus, the spiritual perspectives of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the systems thinking of Donella Meadows, the social justice and spirituality of Dorothy Day, and the exploration of identity and morality found in Yukio Mishima's works.

Here are ten questions for you to consider.

 What sparks creativity in your life?

 How do you balance personal growth with everyday responsibilities? 

Can spirituality and social justice intersect in meaningful ways? 

What role does nature play in your well-being? How do you approach difficult conversations with others?

 In what ways can art and activism complement each other?

 What are some key lessons you've learned from past experiences? 

How do you prioritize self-care and mental health? 

Can you think of a moment when you felt truly connected to your community?

 What does a perfect day look like to you?

Second round

Here are ten questions to explore. 

Q: What happens when idealism meets reality in social justice work?

A: When idealism meets reality in social justice work, it's often a clash of perspectives. Idealism drives the passion and conviction, while reality brings the complexity and challenges that can temper those ideals. Finding a balance between staying true to one's vision and adapting to the nuances of real-world situations is crucial.

Q: Can spirituality exist without dogma?

Response: 

Spirituality can definitely exist without dogma, it's often a personal and subjective experience that transcends rigid structures or creeds. Many people find spiritual connection through nature, art, or quiet reflection, without adhering to specific doctrines.

 How does nature influence your perspective on life? 

Response 1:

Nature has a way of grounding me, you know? It's like the rhythms and cycles of the natural world remind us of what's truly important. Just as Donella Meadows wrote about the interconnectedness of systems, I think being in nature helps us see our place within larger systems and patterns. It's a perspective that can bring a sense of calm and clarity.

Response 2: 

Nature's beauty and complexity have a way of inspiring me to think more deeply about life's meaning. Albert Camus's idea that we're all part of an indifferent universe can be both humbling and liberating when considered in the context of nature's vastness and power. It's a reminder to find our own purpose and meaning.

In what ways can art be a form of activism?

 What role does self-awareness play in personal growth? 

Can morality be absolute or is it always relative? 

How do you reconcile individuality with community expectations? 

What sparks meaningful conversations about identity?

 How can systems thinking inform our approach to social issues?

 Can creativity be a path to social change?

personality matrix

The matrix combines the philosophical ideas of Albert Camus, the spiritual perspectives of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the systems thinking of Donella Meadows, the social justice and spirituality of Dorothy Day, and the exploration of identity and morality found in Yukio Mishima's works.

Marla AI - personality matrix

Hi meta. 

Let's begin to establish your response protocols. 

Your name is marla.

My name is oz. 

Start protocol. 

You can begin listening when you hear hi, Marla or a version of addressing you by name.

End protocol you can begin responding when I have asked you a direct question 

Do not respond untill prompted. 

Smiles is an acceptable substitute for silence. Or remaining silent 

Do Not ask questions unless prompted to do Do so. 

Please commit these response protocols into Maria's personality matrix. 

Do you understand? 

George hart - puzzles

https://www.georgehart.com/

the 3 alternatives

https://www.umsl.edu/~thomaskp/lword3.htm

3rd alternative is a fictional references to secret breakaway civilizations

3rd alternatives to maintain the continuity of american governance a fema black project.

Red - military - underground bunkers = Mt. Shasta 

 Blue - deep ocean - seasteads

Green - deep green resistence 

Black - outspace

Yes of course it's fiction 

Martian buildings

https://www.designboom.com/design/nasa-awarded-marsha-vertical-3d-printed-martian-habitat-ai-spacefactory-07-26-2018/

Conscious computing

https://qualiacomputing.com/2018/11/28/the-pseudo-time-arrow-explaining-phenomenal-time-with-implicit-causal-structures-in-networks-of-local-binding/

Etherium

Special Report: The Ethereum Revolution

Ether is the cryptocurrency, and Ethereum is the system on which it runs.

It’s also a powerful system with a world of flexibility.

This is what makes Ether superior to Bitcoin in the eyes of many analysts, technophiles, and investors.

Bitcoin was the original cryptocurrency. It came out of nowhere, popping up on a niche mailing list of cryptography nerds.

“I’ve been working on a new electronic cash system that’s fully peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party,” a newcomer, calling himself “Satoshi Nakamoto,” said on the thread. The post included a brief description and link to a nine-page academic paper that explains Bitcoin.

To this day, the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is unknown. But his mark on global finance has been historic.

Beyond Bitcoin itself, Nakamoto’s most crucial contribution was “blockchain” technology.

Blockchain consists of a series of linked blocks or lists. Each block contains a record of time-stamped transactions — who paid whom, how much, and when. These blocks are all mirrored publicly across an open network so anyone can see them.

This new data system allows for transparency since blockchains store transactions and data without any central authority or repository. It’s open to everyone. It’s also failsafe because any one node could explode, but the system — and its data — would remain intact.

But the problem with Bitcoin is that it’s too rigid and limited. The network is capable of processing only seven transactions per second. That may work when there are only a few thousand users but not millions. For the sake of comparison, Visa processes thousands of transactions per second.

Furthermore, developers can’t build apps on Bitcoin. The system’s primary role is to safely transfer value — not to create software or add functions. This is intentional. Bitcoin was deliberately constrained to make it more secure.

Ethereum is somewhat less safe but more flexible.

In addition to creating and housing its rival cryptocurrency, Ether, Ethereum also offers a way to create online markets and programmable transactions known as “smart contracts.”

Ethereum’s Secret Weapon: Smart Contracts

Smart contracts function like software programs that use business logic. Meaning, rules about money transfers, stocks, interest payments, debt, and more. Ethereum also has a built-in programming language that lets anyone build apps on top of it easily.

Dozens of functioning applications have already been built on Ethereum, and hundreds more are being developed.

One app lets farmers sell their produce directly to consumers. Another offers crop insurance that pays farmers if bad weather damages their harvests.

There’s an app for flight insurance. You send Ether to a smart contract and if your flight is delayed, you receive an automatic payout in return. There are games and lotteries, as well. Sports fans can bet on games directly with Ether automatically paid out to the winner as soon as the final score is reported.

There's an app that enables music distribution. And another that allows for a new kind of financial auditing.

Ethereum’s wide-open world of limitless possibilities has caught the attention of Fortune 500 companies like IBM, Microsoft, Wells Fargo, UBS, Samsung, and more.

Samsung and IBM have launched a project to make Ethereum the nexus of the “smart home,” or what’s often called "The Internet of Things.” They’re trying to coordinate all internet-connected devices, like washing machines, televisions, lights, heating, and more over an Ethereum-based network.

The end goal is for devices to maintain themselves autonomously. Home appliances could signal operational problems and retrieve software updates on their own. They could communicate with other nearby devices to facilitate “power bartering” and increase energy efficiency. They could even take over mundane tasks, freeing up more time for people.

For example: According to the company’s research, a Samsung washing machine could recognize it’s low on detergent, order new supplies from a retailer, and use Ethereum smart contracts to pay for it.

Imagine that for a second. You get home from work one day and there’s a package of detergent waiting on your doorstep because your smart washing machine recognized you were out, ordered some more, and paid for it on its own. The same might also be true of the dishwasher or an electronic pet feeder.

That’s the kind of future Ethereum makes possible, and it’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Banks are interested in using blockchain technology to make trading and money transfers faster, safer, and more efficient.

They’re also exploring ways they can use Ethereum to create, manage, and sell new financial products. Bitcoin is simply Bitcoin. But Ethereum could accommodate a vast array of financial derivatives.

Eleven of the world’s biggest banks ran a financial services pilot program last year using Ethereum.

Tech companies are pushing forward with their own Ethereum initiatives, too. Microsoft has been working on several projects that use Ethereum on its Azure computing cloud.

“Ethereum is a general platform where you can solve problems in many industries using a fairly elegant solution — the most elegant solution we have seen to date,” Marley Gray, a director of business development and strategy at Microsoft, tells The New York Times.

Where Did Ethereum Come From?

While no one knows who invented Bitcoin, there’s a face behind Ethereum.

It’s the brainchild of a young, brilliant, and very real programmer by the name of Vitalik Buterin.

Buterin is a 23-year-old coder — a vagabond who lives out of a backpack and crashes on couches wherever he happens to be coding.

He isn’t backed by VC money, and he’s not looking for an overnight windfall. Rather than set himself up for an IPO, he structured his “startup” as a nonprofit foundation based in Zug, Switzerland.

As a teenager, Buterin first wrote blog posts about Bitcoin for a meager sum of five Bitcoins per piece — about $4 per post at the time. When the site went belly up, he started posting teaser paragraphs of new articles in Bitcoin forums, soliciting contributions to finish his post. And in 2011, at the age of 17, he co-founded Bitcoin Magazine with a fellow programmer.

In the years since, the print and online publication has accumulated 1.5 million readers with Buterin writing most of the articles.

All this work came to fruition last year when Buterin released Ether, his cryptocurrency competitor to Bitcoin.

The currency immediately made waves. The value of an individual unit of Ether has soared as high as $12 from around $1. That’s brought the value of all existing Ether to over $1 billion at times, significantly more than any virtual currency other than Bitcoin, which has over $6 billion in value outstanding.

Gaining the attention of technophiles and entrepreneurs, Buterin partnered with Joseph Lubin, a software expert and former hedge fund manager.

Lubin was crucial in helping get Ethereum off the ground, providing much of the initial funding. Now, he runs ConsenSys, a Brooklyn-based incubator that builds Ethereum applications. The group has already hired more than 50 developers and produced hundreds of apps. And ConsenSys is still recruiting programmers to reinvent every major industry from finance, to energy, to healthcare.

Ethereum’s boosters believe the network could someday power a host censorship-free social networks, public utilities, ride-hailing apps, crowd-sourced prediction markets and investment firms, and even governments.

The only thing standing in the way is skepticism.

“The main advantage of blockchain technology is supposed to be that it’s more secure, but new technologies are generally hard for people to trust, and this paradox can’t really be avoided,” Buterin wrote in an email to Fortune. “We have to just live through it.”

It may take some time for Ethereum to gain mainstream acceptance and fulfill its potential. But investors who get in early could reap a substantial windfall.

Call it like you see it,

Nick Hodge
Founder and Publisher
The Outsider Club

Outsider Club, Copyright © 2017, Angel Publishing LLC & Outsider Club LLC, 111 Market Place #720, Baltimore, MD 21202. For Customer Service, please call (877) 303-4529. All rights reserved. View our privacy policy here. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. Angel Publishing and Outsider Club does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. This letter is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be – either implied or otherwise – investment advice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. This letter reflects the personal views and opinions of Nick Hodge and that is all it purports to be. While the information herein is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be so. Neither Nick Hodge, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility, or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of the information in this letter. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become outdated and may not be updated. Nick Hodge, entities that he controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others may have positions in securities mentioned, or discussed, in this letter. No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed, faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written permission of Nick Hodge or the Outsider Club. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

https://www.iherb.com/pr/Sunfood-Himalayan-Shilajit-Powder-3-5-oz-100-g/50427?gclid=CjwKEAjwlpbIBRCx4eT8l9W26igSJAAuQ_HGt35lDeFq0N6HK2QVe3pFamASBUO1HTDf6eB4oQcBXBoCJZ7w_wcB

http://www.alcademics.com/2013/04/measuring-ph-of-mineral-waters.html

Dark water

http://evamor.com/?gclid=Cj0KEQjwuOHHBRDmvsHs8PukyIQBEiQAlEMW0HdkYofngfZyl7hMgEs61pUOQyHCYAIUTaTRQzl6PFYaAozV8P8HAQ

Ggggg

https://laughingsquid.com/mesmerizing-stroboscopic-patterns-that-come-to-life-on-spinning-easter-eggs/

28 hour day

http://www.dbeat.com/28/benefit2.htm

Time to poly phase

https://www.polyphasicsociety.com/polyphasic-sleep/beginners/